Saturday, November 26, 2005

Poem

If the world was a happy place
With a constant smile on its face

And if I could ask for anything
Which in seconds someone would it bring

Then I know what I would ask
It would be a very simple task

This thing could only be inspired by God
A small perfectly engineered iPOD

Wednesday, November 23, 2005

ARTICLE: THE END OF MOVIE THEATRES..?

This article was sourced by Ed Branding, Film Researcher for FilmNashville:

October 28, 2005

latimes.com : Business

DIRECTOR WARNS OF BIG SCREEN'S EXTINCTION

M. Night Shyamalan says ending the delay of DVD releases would doom moviegoing.

By Claudia Eller, Times Staff Writer

One of Hollywood's top filmmakers delivered a rallying cry to the nation's theater owners Thursday, warning that one of the great American traditions the collective moviegoing experience was being threatened with extinction.

Speaking at the annual ShowEast convention in Orlando, Fla., M. Night Shyamalan, the director and writer of such blockbusters as "The Sixth Sense" and "Signs," condemned those who are pushing to eliminate what has traditionally been a months-long delay between the release of a movie on the big screen and its debut on DVD. Doing away with that window will not only destroy the exhibition industry, Shyamalan warned, but it will also diminish the artistic integrity of moviemaking.

"Art is the ability to convey that we are not alone," Shyamalan told the gathering of more than 800 theater operators and suppliers at the
convention's closing night dinner. "When I sit down next to you in a movie theater, we get to share each other's point of view. We become part of a collective soul. That's the magic in the movies."

Then he added: "If this thing happens, you know the majority of your theaters are closing. It's going to crush you guys."

The proposal to simultaneously release movies in theaters and on DVD is the most pressing issue facing the exhibition industry today. Since this summer, when incoming Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Bob Iger told media analysts he was open to the idea, it has exploded into an industrywide debate.

But until Thursday, the discussion had focused largely on the need to increase the studios' bottom lines amid this year's box-office slump. For the most part, members of the creative community have kept quiet a fact that Shyamalan said bespoke a regrettable apathy among his fellow directors.

In an interview, Shyamalan said his speech at ShowEast was intended to address what he believes has been sadly missing from the debate: what he called "the human factor" of the moviegoing experience. Simply put, he said, part of what makes movies an art form is that they are viewed on a big screen with a big audience.

Shyamalan's effort to shift what has largely been an economic debate to an artistic one puts him at odds with another high-profile writer-director, Steven Soderbergh.

An Oscar winner who has made such films as "Traffic," "Ocean's Eleven" and "Erin Brockovich," Soderbergh has been a fierce advocate of eliminating the window during which movies can be seen only in theaters.

As recently as June, at a Directors Guild of America event in New York, Shyamalan and Soderbergh argued vehemently though respectfully about Soderbergh's support of simultaneous release, according to someone who witnessed the exchange. The spirited discussion was notable in part because both are regarded as creative risk-takers, not mere purveyors of formulaic "popcorn" movies.

Shyamalan declined to discuss the summertime spat, saying only, "We're both fiery and passionate." Shyamalan said he believed Soderbergh "loves cinema," but if he prevailed, "I think he's going to kill it."

Soderbergh, who was unavailable Thursday for comment, announced last spring that he planned to make six high-definition movies for simultaneous release in theaters, on DVD and on pay cable. His goal: to give consumers more choices as to how and when they see movies.

"I'm sure some people will say, 'Why do this?' And my response is, 'Why wouldn't you?' " Soderbergh said in an April interview with The Times. "The film business in general is using a model that is outdated and, worse than that, inefficient."

In August, Disney's Iger weighed in, telling a group of industry analysts that studios should consider releasing their DVDs at the same time movies show in theaters.

"I think that all the old rules should be called into question because the rules in terms of consumption have changed so dramatically," Iger said, suggesting that decreased theater attendance and slowing DVD sales should be a "wake-up call" for the industry to change its ways.

Not all studio chiefs feel as Iger does. Sony Pictures Entertainment Chairman Michael Lynton said Thursday, "We at Sony believe very strongly in the theatrical window. It is our lifeblood as well as that of theater owners."

Lynton said that the theatrical window was essential to preserving not just the theater business, but the popularity of movies in general.
"Busting it up," he said, "is dangerous."

While the rise of piracy had already prompted studios to shorten the traditional six-month window between a film's theatrical and video release by about two months, Soderbergh and Iger's comments have sparked a firestorm.

John Fithian, president of the National Assn. of Theatre Owners, publicly attacked Iger for reducing movies to little more than "commodities."

"I'm not sure who was asleep, but it wasn't the exhibition industry," Fithian said in response to Iger's remarks. "Here's what we know about
2005: The movies aren't as good."

Shortly after his public spat with Iger, Fithian received a call from Shyamalan's agent. The soft-spoken director wanted to speak out.

"I don't get involved in too many causes, but this is what I do for a living," Shyamalan said in an interview.

Two weeks ago, as he was preparing to host ShowEast, Fithian and his organization's general counsel flew to Philadelphia to visit the director on the set of the movie he is shooting, the fantasy thriller "Lady in the Water." After hours of discussing the hot-button issue, Fithian suggested that Shyamalan make his first public statement in Orlando.

At Thursday's closing night dinner, Shyamalan assured his audience that his movies are made to be viewed in theaters. DVDs, cable and all other ancillary markets are just "souvenirs," he said, that are meant to enhance but not replace the theatergoing experience.

"I came here to tell you that what you do is something sacred. Nobody has benefited more from DVD sales than me. I bought my house on DVD sales from 'The Sixth Sense.' But take away my house. That's not why I do what I do."

"If I can't make movies for theaters, I don't want to make movies," Shyamalan told The Times. "I hope this is a very bad idea that goes away."

Saturday, November 19, 2005

Bono Chrisitan?

I’ve been researching this Bono Christian question. (My friend Andre is gonna kill me) I first ran across this article which chronicles the whole u2 Christian phenomenon. This was the most significant statement I found.

In "1994's PopMart tour featured an intermission sequence in which a transvestite's genitals were displayed on stadium monitors for several minutes."


Just in case you are still wondering if bono is a Christian here is an article in rolling stone magazine (November 3, 2005), this is only and excerpt and just in the excerpt you will find

sh*t 6 times
fu*K - 4 times
and d*ck head

Here's an excerpt:

"What is your religious belief today? What is your concept of God?

If I could put it simply, I would say that I believe there's a force of love and logic in the world, a force of love and logic behind the universe. And I believe in the poetic genius of a creator who would choose to express such unfathomable power as a child born in "straw poverty"; i.e., the story of Christ makes sense to me."


I would say that Bono is Spiritual (and confused) but all signs point to non-Christian. What I find ironic is how are Christians are still latched on to him? Ive found several articles deifying him in Christianity Today. But if he were a pastor using the same language and having the same views he would be dismissed immediately. Dont get me wrong the music is still great, but thats not whats up for debate.

Thursday, November 10, 2005

Slither

Slither... um... who's the smart guy in Hollywood that actually thought this would be a good idea. Actually who is the genius that managed to convince the smart guy that this would actually make a good movie? I would like to hire him, he must have some crazy negotiating skillz.

Monday, November 07, 2005

Predictions Fullfilled

About a month ago I posted my predictions on the future of filmmaking, I honestly wasn't expecting my predictions to come to be so quickly!
First let me quote what I said: “...I think that maybe we will begin to see more movies that are really short films, like seeing three movies instead of one. Granted this has already been done by Sin City, but I think maybe a fad will arise where this happens more. The traditional 120-minute movie though will still be around.” There is a new movie coming out titled “Three Extremes” that is a compilation of three short films by three indie directors. The film also fulfilled a prediction I didn't write, which was that movies would become more and more violent. In this film one of the characters eats a fetus. Yes you read that right. A baby fetus.

Another prediction was:”Homosexuality will become more mainstream, and having a sex scene with gay lovers will be more common. Ewww.” This fall I have just heard we will be having a whole slew of Homosexual movies including: Capote, Kiss Kiss Bang Bang, Breakfast on Pluto, Trans-America, Ms. Henderson Presents, The Family Stone, Rent, and Ang Lee’s Brokeback Mountain. Brokeback Mountain (according to imdb): “A raw, powerful story of two young men, a Wyoming ranch hand and a rodeo cowboy, who meet in the summer of 1963 sheepherding in the harsh, high grasslands of contemporary Wyoming and form an unorthodox yet life-long bond--by turns ecstatic, bitter and conflicted.“ its a gay movie, with gay cowboys starring Jake Gyllenhaal and Heath Ledger.... lets pray this movie flops. But I have a feeling it is only the beginning.

Sunday, November 06, 2005

Christian film making...Oxymoron?

The Hulk - A New Classic

"The Hulk" is an amazing movie. This film seems to have just disappeared after its huge entrance. I decided to watch this film again and if found very interesting.

The thing about the Hulk is that the way they animated him for the majority of the time was very different than normal. Ang Lee (director) evidently donned the motion capture suit and basically acted like the Hulk for the animation. And you can tell this when watching it. for example in some scenes he would just run around screaming like an animal. There was so much personality in the hulk's animation that really came through. Like when he beats the tanks up, he scratches his arm and taunts a little bit. This made the Hulk much more fascinating. Ang Lee knows what's wrong with animated characters - that being namely that they are to general, conceptual and perfect. He did a good job at fixing the problem, granted it still looked fake, but that wasn't due to the performance of the Hulk. You should check out "The Hulk" if you don't have anything else to see, you will be pleasantly surprised I think.

New Genre - The Mythological

Well I stated before that a possible next genre would be about the ancient Greek gods. But I just realized after watching "The Hulk" again, that comic book characters are just that, gods. The old mythology has taken more scientific roots, but it still has the supernatural power. Once I grasped this principle I found it fascinating. I never knew how they came up with characters like they did, but if you take the old Greek and roman gods as a guide you cant go wrong. I still think though that mythological characters and their stories are much more fascinating though. They are much richer deeper and real in my opinion. But I would call comic book based movies a new genre.

Tuesday, November 01, 2005

Chicken Little

For those of you who don’t know this Friday will be the opening of the movie “Chicken Little.” This has significance for two reasons. The first is that it will be showing in limited theatres in 3D. The second reason is that this is Disney’s first digital animated film. Pixar split from Disney and if this movie doesn’t do well, then that means that Disney could be old news. And we all know Disney is no longer at the top of the animation food chain. Pixar is. Also I've heard comments that the movie may not be very good. That it has copied elements from "Shrek", and contains nothing new. This being an omen that Disney may soon become the follower and not the leader.